- #IS MAC OR WINDOWS BETTER FOR SMALL BUSINESS MAC OS X#
- #IS MAC OR WINDOWS BETTER FOR SMALL BUSINESS SOFTWARE#
- #IS MAC OR WINDOWS BETTER FOR SMALL BUSINESS WINDOWS 7#
Arguing that one religion is “better” because it has twenty times more followers falls on deaf ears. To some extent, operating system preference is equivalent to religion.
#IS MAC OR WINDOWS BETTER FOR SMALL BUSINESS MAC OS X#
I will simply point to a post from Marcus Ranum from years ago explaining the false logic of the monoculture argument, and reiterate that despite all desperate claims to the contrary Linux and Mac OS X are both vulnerable as well and that the reason Microsoft is the prime target is a function of its market share more than the underlying security of the operating system itself. I won’t even go into the monoculture or security fallacies that Linux and Mac OS X loyalists cling to. Microsoft provides such a framework, and it is the framework that IT admins and end-users are most familiar with. However, IT admins don’t just need tools that work on the individual systems, they need solutions that can be configured, maintained, and monitored across the infrastructure on systems both local and remote. I have no doubt that there are similar tools available for either Linux or Mac OS X.
#IS MAC OR WINDOWS BETTER FOR SMALL BUSINESS SOFTWARE#
Windows provide tools like BitLocker to encrypt data stored on the hard drive, and BitLocker-to-Go to encrypt data on removable media, and AppLocker to restrict which software can run on the platform to those designated on the white list. Depending on the business, IT admins have to address and comply with a variety of regulatory and industry mandates: SOX, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GLBA, BASEL-II–you name it. IT admins need a desktop OS culture that can be easily monitored and maintained across a high volume of systems no matter where they are located.Ĥ. It isn’t enough for a given platform to have a unique feature or incremental performance boost over another. But, businesses many systems–hundreds, or maybe thousands or tens of thousands. Windows are based on a head-to-head match between individual systems. Most of the tit-for-tat comparisons made regarding Linux or Mac OS X vs. This was already mentioned as a function of cost, but its worth mentioning again. The time and frustration normally invested in VPN and remote access connections affects productivity and has a real-world impact on business.ģ.
#IS MAC OR WINDOWS BETTER FOR SMALL BUSINESS WINDOWS 7#
Windows, in particular Windows 7 with Windows Server 2008, has features such as DirectAcess and BranchCache that greatly enhance connectivity and productivity on remote systems whether they are located in a satellite office across the country, or connecting from a coffee shop on the other side of the world. Microsoft Windows has the tools and infrastructure necessary to accomplish these tasks across 100 or 10,000 PCs efficiently and cost-effectively.Ģ.
Operating systems and software have to be deployed, monitored, maintained, supported, updated, patched, and protected. Second of all, the cost of the actual operating system is a mere fraction of the total cost of ownership. First of all, if a business wants any support for the platform, it must get Linux with a support agreement…for a fee.
0 kommentar(er)
